Re: BABYLON 5 Charges re: PARA

 Posted on 12/18/1994 by jmsatb5@aol.com to rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated


It's hard to believe that anyone could consider B5 "too expsensive"
since it costs considerably *less* than DS9 or Voyager to produce, by
quite a margin.

jms



Re: BABYLON 5 Charges re: PARA

 Posted on 12/19/1994 by jmsatb5@aol.com to rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated


Yes, stations "have bills to pay," but buying a cheaper show isn't
necessarily the solution if that show doesn't pull ratings. Because the
money a station earns to PAY those bills comes from advertisers, based on
the ratings. And B5 is currently rating very well.

jms